I don't know why but Yakov jumped on a small part of my message. Ben, can you spare some comments on this?
I just wonder if, with the new charter, nvo3 will be able work on VM mobility solutions, including on VXLAN environments? Regards, Behcet On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Benson Schliesser <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Yakov and Behcet. > > If the private feedback that I referred to doesn't become public on the > mailing list, then for the purpose of my evaluation it doesn't exist. > > I will hold off on starting LC for a day or two, just to accommodate the US > holiday... > > Cheers, > -Benson > > On Sep 1, 2014 1:16 PM, "Yakov Rekhter" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Behcet, >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: nvo3 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Behcet Sarikaya >> > Sent: Monday, September 01, 2014 12:09 PM >> > To: Benson Schliesser; Bocci, Matthew (Matthew) >> > Cc: [email protected] >> > Subject: Re: [nvo3] VM Mobility Draft >> > >> > Hi Ben, Matthew, >> > >> > Yes, nvo3 worked on problem statement and issues on VM mobility. I >> > support progressing Linda's draft. >> >> As a co-author I support progressing the draft. >> >> If, as Benson said in the e-mail below, there is "some private feedback >> that I’d like to see discussed on the list before we take that step", >> I suggest to discuss this feedback as part of the WG Last Call. >> >> Yakov. >> >> > >> > I just wonder if, with the new charter, nvo3 will be able work on VM >> > mobility solutions, including on VXLAN environments? >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > Behcet >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Benson Schliesser >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > Hi, Linda - >> > > >> > > (I’ve changed the message Subject to better reflect this topic.) >> > > >> > > On Aug 29, 2014, at 12:41 PM, Linda Dunbar <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> I think we should decide how to handle this based on a WG discussion >> > about the draft, instead of binding it to the rechartering. It might be >> > worthwhile to have a brief presentation on the draft at the 11-Sep >> > virtual interim meeting - can one of the authors lead this? >> > >> >> > >> [Linda] The mobility draft is to address an important area of VM >> > mobility in Data Centers, which the WG had adopted to become WG draft >> > long time ago. We sent request for WG Last call many months ago. But >> > there hasn't been any action. Since the MILESTONEs have separate items >> > for IESG Review and WG adoption for many drafts, it is necessary to list >> > VM Mobility as well. >> > > >> > > I see two related questions here. First is the question about whether >> > we need to create a milestone for the VM Mobility draft. Second is >> > whether it is ready for last call. >> > > >> > > On the first topic, I don’t see value in debating this, but I will >> > explain my decision. I consider the VM Mobility draft to be a >> > “companion” >> > to the Problem Statement. And I assert that if it is complete (or nearly >> > complete) then a milestone is unnecessary from a management tracking >> > perspective. Thus, we do not need another milestone specifically for a >> > VM >> > Mobility Issues document unless the WG feels that it needs more work, >> > material changes, etc. >> > > >> > > On the second topic, personally I agree with you that the VM Mobility >> > Issues draft should be last-called soon. However, I’ve had some private >> > feedback that I’d like to see discussed on the list before we take that >> > step. Specifically, a couple people commented that the draft is >> > unnecessary, questioning whether it adds materially to what is already >> > captured in the Problem Statement. I’m not endorsing this point of view, >> > but nor am I challenging it. >> > > >> > > Thus, in my last message I submitted a request for you to present the >> > draft at the upcoming interim meeting, to give us a chance to discuss >> > this feedback. I’m also happy to discus this here on the mailing list. >> > But I’d like to see some kind of response before making a decision to >> > last-call the draft. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > -Benson >> > > >> > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > nvo3 mailing list >> > > [email protected] >> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > nvo3 mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
