Hi, Yakov and Behcet.

If the private feedback that I referred to doesn't become public on the
mailing list, then for the purpose of my evaluation it doesn't exist.

I will hold off on starting LC for a day or two, just to accommodate the US
holiday...

Cheers,
-Benson
On Sep 1, 2014 1:16 PM, "Yakov Rekhter" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Behcet,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nvo3 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Behcet Sarikaya
> > Sent: Monday, September 01, 2014 12:09 PM
> > To: Benson Schliesser; Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [nvo3] VM Mobility Draft
> >
> > Hi Ben, Matthew,
> >
> > Yes, nvo3 worked on problem statement and issues on VM mobility. I
> > support progressing Linda's draft.
>
> As a co-author I support progressing the draft.
>
> If, as Benson said in the e-mail below, there is "some private feedback
> that I’d like to see discussed on the list before we take that step",
> I suggest to discuss this feedback as part of the WG Last Call.
>
> Yakov.
>
> >
> > I just wonder if,  with the new charter, nvo3 will be able work on VM
> > mobility solutions, including on VXLAN environments?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Behcet
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Benson Schliesser
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hi, Linda -
> > >
> > > (I’ve changed the message Subject to better reflect this topic.)
> > >
> > > On Aug 29, 2014, at 12:41 PM, Linda Dunbar <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >> I think we should decide how to handle this based on a WG discussion
> > about the draft, instead of binding it to the rechartering. It might be
> > worthwhile to have a brief presentation on the draft at the 11-Sep
> > virtual interim meeting - can one of the authors lead this?
> > >>
> > >> [Linda] The mobility draft is to address an important area of VM
> > mobility in Data Centers, which the WG had adopted to become WG draft
> > long time ago. We sent request for WG Last call many months ago. But
> > there hasn't been any action. Since the MILESTONEs have separate items
> > for IESG Review and WG adoption for many drafts, it is necessary to list
> > VM Mobility as well.
> > >
> > > I see two related questions here. First is the question about whether
> > we need to create a milestone for the VM Mobility draft. Second is
> > whether it is ready for last call.
> > >
> > > On the first topic, I don’t see value in debating this, but I will
> > explain my decision. I consider the VM Mobility draft to be a “companion”
> > to the Problem Statement. And I assert that if it is complete (or nearly
> > complete) then a milestone is unnecessary from a management tracking
> > perspective. Thus, we do not need another milestone specifically for a VM
> > Mobility Issues document unless the WG feels that it needs more work,
> > material changes, etc.
> > >
> > > On the second topic, personally I agree with you that the VM Mobility
> > Issues draft should be last-called soon. However, I’ve had some private
> > feedback that I’d like to see discussed on the list before we take that
> > step. Specifically, a couple people commented that the draft is
> > unnecessary, questioning whether it adds materially to what is already
> > captured in the Problem Statement. I’m not endorsing this point of view,
> > but nor am I challenging it.
> > >
> > > Thus, in my last message I submitted a request for you to present the
> > draft at the upcoming interim meeting, to give us a chance to discuss
> > this feedback. I’m also happy to discus this here on the mailing list.
> > But I’d like to see some kind of response before making a decision to
> > last-call the draft.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Benson
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > nvo3 mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nvo3 mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
>
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to