Andy, Thanks for your email, below, it was extremely helpful. Will you also be making some engineering comments?
John Sent from my iPhone > -----Original Message----- > From: Randy Bush [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 1:49 PM > To: John E Drake > Cc: nvo3 > Subject: Re: [nvo3] Poll for WG adoption: draft-narten-nvo3-overlay- > problem-statement-04 > > >> If adopted, the draft will be renamed draft-ietf-nvo3-... > > JD: And prior to its adoption, its name would be? > > what it is, draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement > > we've been doing it this way we for a while. you'll survive. > > > The distinction between a problem statement and a set of requirements > > seems, in retrospect, to be artificial. > > perhaps some technical examples would help us understand where you > think we have gone wrong. > > and could we focus on engineering not process? > > randy _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
