>> If adopted, the draft will be renamed draft-ietf-nvo3-... > JD: And prior to its adoption, its name would be?
what it is, draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement we've been doing it this way we for a while. you'll survive. > The distinction between a problem statement and a set of requirements > seems, in retrospect, to be artificial. perhaps some technical examples would help us understand where you think we have gone wrong. and could we focus on engineering not process? randy _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
