Please update to latest package/code as I pushed a fix that *could* address this
Alfredo > On 21 Jan 2020, at 16:06, Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > > sorry but I do not have lspci installed in this host. What I know is that I > have 2 onboard 1Gb ports and one 2-port 82599em and one 4-port intel 1Gb NIC. > I have installed zc license for p1p1. The management port is em1. > the ifconfig and ethtool info are listed here: > > [root@r510 ~]# ethtool -i p1p1 > driver: ixgbe > version: 5.5.3 > firmware-version: 0x2b2c0001 > expansion-rom-version: > bus-info: 0000:08:00.0 > supports-statistics: yes > supports-test: yes > supports-eeprom-access: yes > supports-register-dump: yes > supports-priv-flags: yes > > > [root@r510 ~]# ethtool -i p1p2 > driver: ixgbe > version: 5.5.3 > firmware-version: 0x2b2c0001 > expansion-rom-version: > bus-info: 0000:08:00.1 > supports-statistics: yes > supports-test: yes > supports-eeprom-access: yes > supports-register-dump: yes > supports-priv-flags: yes > > > [root@r510 ~]# ethtool -i em1 > driver: bnx2 > version: 2.2.6 > firmware-version: 6.0.1 bc 5.2.3 NCSI 2.0.10 > expansion-rom-version: > bus-info: 0000:01:00.0 > supports-statistics: yes > supports-test: yes > supports-eeprom-access: yes > supports-register-dump: yes > supports-priv-flags: no > > > [root@r510 ~]# ifconfig > em1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 192.168.66.101 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.66.255 > inet6 fe80::2001:70e3:7246:b725 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> > ether 84:2b:2b:78:8a:62 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 26069 bytes 3177036 (3.0 MiB) > RX errors 0 dropped 1 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 5945 bytes 1443645 (1.3 MiB) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > em2: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > ether 84:2b:2b:78:8a:63 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host> > loop txqueuelen 1000 (Local Loopback) > RX packets 19 bytes 1737 (1.6 KiB) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 19 bytes 1737 (1.6 KiB) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > p1p1: flags=4419<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > ether 48:f8:db:7e:da:5c txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 6322614433 bytes 3091202586919 (2.8 TiB) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 869 bytes 147082 (143.6 KiB) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > device memory 0xdd300000-dd380000 > > p1p2: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > ether 48:f8:db:7e:da:5d txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > device memory 0xdd380000-dd400000 > > p2p1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > ether 00:1b:21:b0:5c:a8 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 287 bytes 98154 (95.8 KiB) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > device memory 0xdebc0000-debdffff > > p2p2: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > ether 00:1b:21:b0:5c:a9 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > device memory 0xdebe0000-debfffff > > p2p3: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > ether 00:1b:21:b0:5c:ac txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > device memory 0xddbc0000-ddbdffff > > p2p4: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > ether 00:1b:21:b0:5c:ad txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > device memory 0xddbe0000-ddbfffff > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 6:08 PM Alfredo Cardigliano <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Hi Wang > please provide: > > 1. lspci | grep Eth > 2. ifconfig > 3. ethtool -i {p1p1,p1p2,<management>} > > Thank you > Alfredo > >> On 21 Jan 2020, at 08:44, Wang <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> hi, >> I have 2 capture interfaces(p1p1 and p1p2, 10Gb) and 1 management interface >> in my server. After I have setup the number of rss queue of p1p1 with >> 'pf_ringcfg --configure-driver ixgbe --rss-queues 2', I tried to start up >> two pfcount to do some test: 'pfcount -i zc:p1p1@0' and 'pfcount -i >> zc:p1p1@1'. After the second pfcount started, I lost my ssh session with my >> server and I cannot ping it neither. Everything came back after several >> minutes waiting without doing anything. >> My pfring version is 7.5.0, and Is there anything wrong with it? >> >> thanks, >> wang >> _______________________________________________ >> Ntop-misc mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc >> <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc> > _______________________________________________ > Ntop-misc mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc > <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc>_______________________________________________ > Ntop-misc mailing list > [email protected] > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
_______________________________________________ Ntop-misc mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
