There have been some changes to logging.  Use -v -v.

-- Murphy

On Jan 12, 2012, at 10:10 AM, Sergio Jiménez Feijóo wrote:

> Hi Aaron,
> 
> I have moved to the destiny branch and compiled everything again. The 
> topology component seems to work fine (I can see "new link detected" messages 
> in the log) but now I can't see the log messages of my application (VLOG_DBG 
> function) despite I'm running NOX with the -v flag. My application isn't 
> working properly yet but until I can see those log messages I won't be able 
> to find the cause of the new problem.
> 
> In response to Ali: I Have tested my application in another testbed without 
> flowvisor but I can't run it in this testbed without flowvisor. I can't 
> disable FlowVisor because I'm using the OFELIA project infraestructure (I 
> share the devices with other experimenters): 
> http://www.fp7-ofelia.eu/ofelia-facility-and-islands/equipment/
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> El 12/01/2012 18:08, Aaron Rosen escribió:
>> 
>> If you do a packet dump at the flowvisor do you see vlan tags on these LLDP 
>> packets returned to you?  
>> 
>> I'm guessing the LLDP packets that are returned to you from the switch (Via 
>> PACKET_IN) ) do not have VLAN tags correct? (The switch takes them off since 
>> this switch isn't acting as a pure of switch. Only this one vlan is being 
>> openflow controlled. ) 
>> 
>> This is the same reason why your controller does not need to know which vlan 
>> tag you are using on the switch. When the controller sends a LLDP packet to 
>> the switch the switch will output that packet on the correct port and 
>> automatically add the tag for you. 
>> 
>> You said this was working with out flowvisor right? If you run git branch 
>> from the nox directory what does it say? 
>> 
>> Aaron
>> 
>> 
>> 2012/1/12 Sergio Jiménez Feijóo <jjji...@gmail.com>
>> Hi Aaron,
>> 
>> My application that runs on NOX examines the packets and forwards them 
>> keeping the same VLAN ID tag. But how does the topology module tell the 
>> switches that they must send the LLDPs with a certain VLAN ID tag? The 
>> topology module is independent from my application and I can't controle it. 
>> If the topology module sends the LLDPs packets without the proper VLAN tag 
>> they won't be forwarded to my controller (because they won't belong to my 
>> FlowVisor flowspace).
>> 
>> This is just a supposition but I think this may be the cause of the problem.
>> 
>> Thank you for your help.
>> 
>> El 12/01/2012 16:25, Aaron Rosen escribió:
>>> Did you do git checkout -b destiny 
>>> 
>>> When the controller sends the LLDP packet it won't have a vlan tag. Once it 
>>> leaves the switch, the switch will add your tag for you.  I don't think 
>>> that's the problem. 
>>> 
>>> Aaron
>>> 
>>> 2012/1/12 Sergio Jiménez Feijóo <jjji...@gmail.com>
>>> Hi Aaron,
>>> 
>>> I'm using the latest version (I think). I downloaded it from the git 
>>> repository by the command "git clone git://noxrepo.org/nox" a few days ago.
>>> 
>>> My flowspace consists on tagging all my trafic with a certain VLAN ID (VLAN 
>>> 13). All the traffic tagged with that VLAN ID belongs to my flowspace. Is 
>>> it possible that the topology component isn't sending the LLDP frames 
>>> tagged with the proper VLAN ID? How can I force the topology component to 
>>> send the LLDP frames tagged with a certain VLAN ID?
>>> 
>>> Thank you.
>>> 
>>> El 12/01/2012 15:33, Aaron Rosen escribió:
>>>> P.S: Which version of nox are you running? I believe this works fine in 
>>>> destiny. 
>>>> 
>>>> Aaron
>>>> 
>>>> 2012/1/12 Aaron Rosen <aro...@clemson.edu>
>>>> Hi, 
>>>> 
>>>> I've encountered an issue like this before with flowvisor and the 
>>>> discovery module. The easiest thing to do is to change the lldp value in 
>>>> 
>>>>  ./src/nox/lib/packet/ethernet.py 
>>>> 
>>>>    #LLDP_TYPE = 0x88cc
>>>>     LLDP_TYPE = new_value
>>>> 
>>>> then add this new_value, ether_type to your slice. 
>>>> 
>>>> Hopefully that will do the trick. 
>>>> 
>>>> Aaron
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 2012/1/12 Sergio Jiménez Feijóo <jjji...@gmail.com>
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>> 
>>>> I've developed a NOX aplication which needs to use the topology component 
>>>> to discover the network topology. I've tested my application in a testbed 
>>>> of 6 Linksys WRT54GL running the OpenWRT Pantou firmware (without 
>>>> flowvisor) and it worked like a charm. Now I'm testing my aplication in a 
>>>> testbed of 5 NEC IP8800/S3640-24T2XW (with flowvisor) and the topology 
>>>> detection isn't working at all (the data struct is empty).
>>>> 
>>>> Since OpenFlow allows an application to run in different devices I've 
>>>> discarded the fact of using new switches as the cause of the error. 
>>>> Therefore I think flowvisor is causing the topology component not to run 
>>>> properly. Is this possible? Have you experienced any problems with 
>>>> flowvisor and NOX?
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you.
>>>> 
>>>> http://homestore.cisco.eu/store/ciscoeu/en_IE/pd/productID.241269400
>>>> http://www.openflow.org/wk/index.php/Pantou_:_OpenFlow_1.0_for_OpenWRT
>>>> http://yuba.stanford.edu/foswiki/bin/view/OpenFlow/Deployment/Vendor/NEC
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nox-dev mailing list
>>>> nox-dev@noxrepo.org
>>>> http://noxrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/nox-dev
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Aaron O. Rosen
>>>> Masters Student - Network Communication
>>>> 306B Fluor Daniel
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Aaron O. Rosen
>>>> Masters Student - Network Communication
>>>> 306B Fluor Daniel
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nox-dev mailing list
>>> nox-dev@noxrepo.org
>>> http://noxrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/nox-dev
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Aaron O. Rosen
>>> Masters Student - Network Communication
>>> 306B Fluor Daniel
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> nox-dev mailing list
>> nox-dev@noxrepo.org
>> http://noxrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/nox-dev
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Aaron O. Rosen
>> Masters Student - Network Communication
>> 306B Fluor Daniel
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nox-dev mailing list
> nox-dev@noxrepo.org
> http://noxrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/nox-dev

_______________________________________________
nox-dev mailing list
nox-dev@noxrepo.org
http://noxrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/nox-dev

Reply via email to