On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:25:14 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:18:16 -0400, David Bremner <[email protected]> wrote: > > We don't actually have test names, at least not ones directly suitable > > for file names. I guess we could encode them or something, is that what > > you mean? > > Don't we? There is at least a word/phrase that's consistent between the > actual test script names, what is listed in the TESTS variable (below), > and what is output when the tests are run (ie. "basic:" or > "search-folder-coherence:"). Are those not test names?
OK, we can call those test names. This thread/patch is about "subtest numbers", so finer granularity. There are an average of 10 subtests per test, those are are the things that don't have names. d _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
