On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:18:16 -0400, David Bremner <[email protected]> wrote: > We don't actually have test names, at least not ones directly suitable > for file names. I guess we could encode them or something, is that what > you mean?
Don't we? There is at least a word/phrase that's consistent between the actual test script names, what is listed in the TESTS variable (below), and what is output when the tests are run (ie. "basic:" or "search-folder-coherence:"). Are those not test names? jamie. TESTS=" basic help-test new count search search-output search-by-folder search-position-overlap-bug search-insufficient-from-quoting search-limiting tagging json multipart thread-naming raw reply dump-restore uuencode thread-order author-order from-guessing long-id encoding emacs emacs-large-search-buffer maildir-sync crypto symbol-hiding search-folder-coherence atomicity python hooks argument-parsing "
pgpU47OLxshrk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
