mdedetrich commented on PR #2460: URL: https://github.com/apache/pekko/pull/2460#issuecomment-3508259144
> We already have JavaFlowSupport so I guess the feedback is that some people prefer that to us moving the code to Source and Sink directly. If the classes/datastructure didn't have the exact same name for both reactive streams and java 9 flow I would have also preferred this option, but in both cases they are called `Publishers`/`Subscribers` which means that you would have `source.asJava9Subscriber`/`source.asReactiveStreamsSubscriber` which is a bit of a mouthful. You could avoid this on the scaladsl side since you can use implicit classes/extension methods and you only import the support that you can are about (i.e. import `java9FlowSupport` vs import `reactivestreams` support) but that doesn't work for javadsl. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
