ibessonov commented on code in PR #5468:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/5468#discussion_r2011912815


##########
modules/distribution-zones/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/distributionzones/rebalance/RebalanceMinimumRequiredTimeProviderImpl.java:
##########
@@ -172,9 +156,9 @@ Map<Integer, NavigableMap<Long, CatalogZoneDescriptor>> 
allZonesByTimestamp(
                 NavigableMap<Long, CatalogZoneDescriptor> map = 
allZones.computeIfAbsent(zone.id(), id -> new TreeMap<>());
 
                 if (map.isEmpty() || 
updateRequiresAssignmentsRecalculation(map.lastEntry().getValue(), zone)) {
-                    map.put(catalog.time(), zone);
+                    map.put(zone.updateTimestamp().longValue(), zone);

Review Comment:
   Can we use `HybridTimestamp` here for keys? This will make code more 
readable. This class is `Comparable`, so no worries about that. Please update 
all the usages of `Long` instead of `HybridTimestamp`, thank you!



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@ignite.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to