I guess I was totally convinced at "it's crap crap crap".

On Tuesday, 29 October 2013 10:59:52 UTC+1, Alex Kocharin wrote:
>
> 29.10.2013, 13:05, "Floby" <[email protected] <javascript:>>:
>
> Thanks for your inputs alex's.
>  
> In my book, jade sucks ass, as does any templating on the server-side.
>
>  
> Yep, that's what I'm talking about.
>  
> Jade can be used quite well for hybrid approach, by which I mean creating 
> the same templates on the server-side and updating them on the client-side 
> without reloading.
>  
> But a lot of the people think that it's a server-side only engine, and 
> that's exactly why people need to teach about its possibilities.
>  
> That's why angular.js sucks by the way. You can't use it on the server 
> side, so it is useful only for a few web applications where client-side js 
> is an actual requirement.
>  
>  
>
> So you see, opinions infer. My suggestion to use javascript MV* frameworks 
> is in fact because they are so hip. Alexander is trying to gather interest, 
> this is probably the best way.
>  
> for code formatting, just feed your code through jshint or jslint. This is 
> the standard for javascript.
>
>  
> Jslint is an opinionated crap. Jshint is better, but only because you can 
> configure it properly. Default codestyle imposed by both these engines is a 
> crap.
>  
> I actually tried to use jshint for a while. And just once in all the years 
> it successfully catched an error for me. I still remember that one case, it 
> was like that:
> var something,
>     foo,
>     bar;  // <-- this
>     baz,
>     qaaz;
>  
> I avoid semicolons since, but I still remember that case for some reason.
>  
> Anyway, running jshint to fix an errors in the code isn't really worth it. 
> Running jshint to check your codestyle is just plainly wrong. It is NOT the 
> standard.
>  
>  
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, 29 October 2013 07:33:32 UTC+1, Alexander Cherednichenko wrote:
>
> Hello Alex, Floby! 
>  
> Thanks for your participation. 
>  
> As for UI - Totally Agree, capitalized. We had extjs as a requirement back 
> then, and really only used it to illustrate node's REST API services. Will 
> defo switch to something fancier later. We are not really happy with Ext in 
> any way, especially after working for a while with it. 
>  
>  
> Grunt, deployment descriptors to NodeJitsu and Joyent - yeah, great idea. 
> If we add a couple of description pages on how to fire up the application, 
> developer-in-study could have their app running in the Internet in like 5 
> minutes, mostly spent for account creation on hosters'. 
>  
> As for indentation - we'll look into that; really have to comply with all 
> the projects' guidelines (which tell to use 4-space), but I also felt 
> that's a little wider than it should be. 
>  
> Thanks all,
> Will keep posted on significant updates to the app -- anyway we were 
> planning to plug in fancy testing of everything (just as an illustrative 
> setup) next.
>  
> Good night, 
> Alex.
>
> On Monday, 28 October 2013 12:58:23 UTC+2, Alex Kocharin wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, October 28, 2013 2:10:03 PM UTC+4, Floby wrote:
>
> Hey, really interesting stuff here.
>  
> I like how you tried to keep the dependencies minimal. However, here are 
> my thoughts for what, in my opinion, could make this better
>
>    - Use something sexier than ExtJS. Like Angular.js or Ember.js. Better 
>    yet, all 3.
>
> Better yet, Jade. Simply because nobody seems to understand how to compile 
> templates and use them on the client side.
>
> I don't know about Ember.js, but Angular.js is largely overrated. I'd 
> avoid that for a long while...
>
>
>    - Use Grunt for front-end assets management
>    - Add necessary files for deployement to Nodejitsu and Joyent in 
>    addition to Heroku
>    - Use 2 spaces indentation for javascript
>
> Use tabs, pleeeeease. I understand that spaces is preferred in large 
> projects because stupid developers don't understand smart tabs, but why do 
> you suggest teaching beginners the wrong things?
>  
>
> IMO, this could become a great example app.
>
> On Sunday, 27 October 2013 20:03:27 UTC+1, Alexander Cherednichenko wrote:
>
> Hello! 
>  
> Me and team at my company (logicify, software consulting) have started 
> node development around a year ago. We had then created a really simple app 
> showcasing the tech stack, and now, after that year, we would like to share 
> it with the community. 
>  
> This is a really simple but fully-functional application featuring data 
> storage (MongoDB), search (Elasticsearch), cloud deployment (Heroku), 
> serverside JSON API (node) and client-side UI (very basic extjs 4). Totally 
> a work in progress rather than finished product. 
>  
> I think it may be useful: 
>
>    1. For learning - just get a grasp of the code in a bite-sized chunk 
>    (s). 
>    2. Sample for integration of technologies - it has quite full a stack 
>    though very small domain (books). 
>    3. Seed, or archetype app - we have been already seeding it twice as a 
>    skeleton for real-life application
>
> So, the links: 
>
>    1. Github, code https://github.com/Logicify/nodejs-sample-task
>    2. my blog, motivation (why we needed that and how we use it?) 
>    
> http://lexaux.blogspot.com/2013/10/nodejs-elasticsearch-mognodb-extjs-and.html
>    3. and as a bonus - 2 slidesets from local meetup me and Pavel Knorr 
>    had last Thursday in Kherson (Russian language!). Just in case :) 
>    
> http://lexaux.blogspot.com/2013/10/two-talks-at-local-software-development.html
>
> Thanks, and good night! 
> Alex
>
>  
> -- 
> -- 
> Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
> Posting guidelines: 
> https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "nodejs" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <javascript:>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected] <javascript:>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
>  
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "nodejs" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>

-- 
-- 
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines: 
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nodejs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to