Dear Joachim,

 

The IW distribution is not something you get from NONMEM, you have to give
the degrees of freedom of the IW prior distribution. Normally this is at or
below the number of subjects in you previous study depending the information
about the parameter per subject.

 

In addition to User's Guides, you may find useful info in Gisleskog et al J
Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2002 Dec;29(5-6):473-505.

 

Best regards,

Mats 

 

Mats Karlsson, PhD

Professor of Pharmacometrics

Dept of Pharmaceutical Biosciences

Faculty of Pharmacy

Uppsala University

Box 591

75124 Uppsala

 

Phone: +46 18 4714105

Fax + 46 18 4714003

 

From: owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com [mailto:owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com] On
Behalf Of Joachim Grevel
Sent: 22 February 2012 15:24
To: 'Coen van Hasselt'; nmusers
Subject: RE: [NMusers] OMEGA priors using modes of inverse Wishart matrix

 

Dear Coen,

 

There I do have the answer: with MCMC Bayesian in NONMEM 7.1 you have to use
NWPRI according to the guide.

 

Dear Nidal,

 

What I try to do is that: use an existing very well defined popPK model
(2500 conc in 200 patients) to obtain individual PK parameters in only 20
additional patients that have sparse sampling (2 to 4 conc per patient). I
was planning to use informative priors rather than add 80 conc  to a bulk of
2500 conc. What do you think?

 

Thanks to all, specifically Tim!

 

Joachim

 

From: Coen van Hasselt [mailto:coen.vanhass...@slz.nl] 
Sent: 22 February 2012 14:03
To: jgre...@o2.co.uk
Subject: Re: [NMusers] OMEGA priors using modes of inverse Wishart matrix

 

Dear Joachim,

I have always wondered about this particular question myself as well..
Thanks for asking at NMusers.

Another thing related to the PRIORs I was wondering about: you can either
use NWPRI (i.e. with the inverse wishart for OMEGA's), or TNPRI, which uses
a multivariate normal for the OMEGA's. Do you have any idea when to use
either of these two possible implementations ?

Thanks,
Coen

>>> "Joachim Grevel" 02/22/12 2:11 PM >>>

Dear NMusers,

Our NONMEM User Guides are full of good advice and they are searchable. Yet
when I tried to find out whether any of the estimation methods could be
enticed to give me the ?inverse Wishart matrix? needed to specify PRIORS for
OMEGAs, I found no help. Leonid G. mentions the inverse Wishart matrix in
his historic contributions to NMusers, but again I could not find out how to
obtain it. If it does not happen in NONMEM, is there a tool in R that can
give me that matrix?

Your help is greatly appreciated,

 

Joachim

 

Joachim Grevel, PhD

Scientific Director

BAST Inc Limited

BioCity Nottingham

Pennyfoot Street

Nottingham, NG1 1GF

Tel: +44 (0)115 8120497

 

Reply via email to