Il giorno gio 20 lug 2023 alle ore 20:20 Alberto Cammozzo via nexa <nexa@server-nexa.polito.it> ha scritto: > [...] > This petition is not the first time the Authors Guild has taken tech > companies to task. In 2005 the writers’ organisation filed a copyright > infringement case against Google, claiming that the search engine’s scanning > of millions of books “was a plain and brazen violation of copyright law”. In > 2016, the long-running dispute came to an end when the US supreme court > denied the Guild the right to appeal the ruling that Google’s scanning of > books constituted “fair use”, and that “Google Books provide significant > public benefits”.
Non vedo ragione per la quale a questo giro dovrebbe andare diversamente. Creative Commons, che di copyright e etica annessa se ne intende, la vede alla stessa maniera: https://creativecommons.org/2023/02/17/fair-use-training-generative-ai/ Fabio _______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa@server-nexa.polito.it https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa
