Tony Moore, on 24 Jun, wrote: > On 24 Jun 2014, David Pitt <pit...@pittdj.co.uk> wrote: > > [snip] > > > !Cache on a RamDisc looks much more promising. This is much better, the > > improvement is clear, and the machine is not taken over as the cache is > > written. > > NetSurf already has a Memory Cache. For the Disc Cache to serve any useful > purpose, it needs to be written to a non-volatile medium. Indeed. I do agree, I was just testing something.
-- David Pitt
