Daniel Silverstone, on 24 Jun, wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 08:10:29 +0100, David Pitt wrote: > > !Cache on a RamDisc looks much more promising. This is much better, the > > improvement is clear, and the machine is not taken over as the cache is > > written. > > You do realise that this is more work for the computer to do than simply > increasing the maximum size of the RAM cache in the browser?
I had not got that far. The notion was just to highlight where the blockage is. In practice the two options perform similarly, as very briefly tested. -- David Pitt
