In message <20090915140951.35722...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net> Rob Kendrick wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:06:02 +0100 > Andrew Weston <aw29...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:57 PM, John-Mark Bell >> <j...@netsurf-browser.org> wrote: >> >>> Indirectly. The RISC OS frontend's lack of maintenance is actively >>> blocking several of these changes being merged. The longer this >>> situation persists, the more likely I am to unilaterally remove >>> support for the RISC OS frontend, as it is holding back >>> improvements for other platforms (and NetSurf in general). >>> >>>> has there been much response yet to your call for help? >>> >>> Several people have expressed interest. None of this has translated >>> into code contributions, however. >> >> Have they applied conditions or are they not able to do it? > There are more than two possible causes, and neither of these are it. > B. Well, I don't know how many people are using NetSurf on each platform but I ONLY use NetSurf on RISC OS because its the most useful and as far as I know the only maintained browser for RISC OS. Withdrawing support for RISC OS, to me, is crazy. There are already far more capable browsers for other platforms so I never use NetSurf on anything other than RISC OS. I can't see my stance changing at least until there is javascript support in NetSurf. I'd love to offer support but I don't have appropriate skills or the time. Mike