In message <20090915140951.35722...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>  
Rob Kendrick wrote:

> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:06:02 +0100
> Andrew Weston <aw29...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:57 PM, John-Mark Bell
>> <j...@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Indirectly. The RISC OS frontend's lack of maintenance is actively
>>> blocking several of these changes being merged. The longer this
>>> situation persists, the more likely I am to unilaterally remove
>>> support for the RISC OS frontend, as it is holding back
>>> improvements for other platforms (and NetSurf in general).
>>>
>>>> has there been much response yet to your call for help?
>>>
>>> Several people have expressed interest. None of this has translated
>>> into code contributions, however.
>>
>> Have they applied conditions or are they not able to do it?

> There are more than two possible causes, and neither of these are it.

> B.

Well, I don't know how many people are using NetSurf on each platform
but I ONLY use NetSurf on RISC OS because its the most useful and as
far as I know the only maintained browser for RISC OS. Withdrawing
support for RISC OS, to me, is crazy. There are already far more
capable browsers for other platforms so I never use NetSurf on
anything other than RISC OS. I can't see my stance changing at least
until there is javascript support in NetSurf.

I'd love to offer support but I don't have appropriate skills or the
time.

Mike


Reply via email to