In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Chris Terran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Keith Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> Chris Terran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> This isn't really a bug, I suppose, but I'm interested in why pages
>>> from the TWO forum like this:
>
>>> http://theweatheroutlook.com/twocommunity/forums/t/18204.aspx
>
>>> take such a long time to render (over two minutes sometimes), with
>>> extensive hourglassing.
>
>> Even up here in the Southern hemisphere it took less than four seconds
>> - and that is with 150 objects to load!
>
>That's interesting -- 4 seconds is probably about the speed I'd expect
>from a page like this. Hence my curiosity!
>
>Just tried again and the page took 184 seconds -- over three minutes
>-- to render fully. Are you using an older NetSurf?
The 184 seconds is similar to Netsurf under Webjames with CSS files, I
wonder if it is looking for a css file and cannot find it and looking
for about 3 minutes before giving up?
>
>Using a proxy (webcache.virginmedia.com) makes it even worse (210sec).
>
>Thanks for responding.
>
>Best, Chris
>
--
Kev Wells http://riscos.kevsoft.co.uk/
http://kevsoft.co.uk/ http://kevsoft.co.uk/AleQuest/
ICQ 238580561
In England's green and pleasant land.
