On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 10:50 -0800, Monty Taylor wrote: > Great list. > > For quantum/common/test_lib.py, I've been working with Jason Kölker to > get nova to be able to use nose directly without run_tests.py. To that > end, he's written openstack-nose. I'd love it if we could get quantum to > use that as well instead of test_lib.py. > > (ultimate goal is that we run tests by running "tox" ... and in the tox > config it simply has "nosetests" as the command to run- with any > additional features we need from nose done as plugins.) > > That being said - someone suggested the other day that perhaps > openstack-nose should be merged in to openstack-common, so that > depending on/installing openstack-common gets you the nose plugin as > well. Jason - thoughts from you?
I toyed with the idea originally, but ended up not since I didn't want openstack.common to be a dependency to run the unittests for openstack.common ;). Also I think keeping it separate allows up to keep our runtime deps and test time deps separate, otherwise openstack.common will have to always have nose in the install_requires (which it really shouldn't even now, but I havn't gotten around to "un-pimping" it.). That said I'm +0 on keeping it separate so its whatever make it easier for people to use it. Happy Hacking! 7-11 -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
