On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Mark McLoughlin <mar...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Dan, > > I've just now posted the plans Jason and I have for openstack-common > here: > > http://wiki.openstack.org/CommonLibrary > > Thanks for poking us into doing it! :) > > Any help you can give would be awesome. Even a wiki page listing the > APIs Quantum has that you think should be in openstack-common would be > great. > Great, thanks for the emails, and for driving the openstack-common work. I have created a launchpad issue to track this, and a wiki page linked to the launchpad issue as a "spec": - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/identify-openstack-common-code - http://wiki.openstack.org/QuantumOpenstackCommon I have assigned myself as the owner, to make sure it gets done, but everyone should feel free to contribute suggestions to the wiki page. Dan > > Cheers, > Mark. > > On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 01:25 -0800, Dan Wendlandt wrote: > > The last netstack email about splitting Quantum repos touched a bit on > > openstack-common, but I thought it was worth creating a separate > > specifically on Quantum + openstack-common. I've tried to CC some of the > > people that seem to be driving discussion of openstack-common > > > > When reviewing the Quantum codebase, there seems to be a good amount of > > "infrastructure" code for both client + server that is not quantum > specific > > and was likely borrowed from existing projects like nova + glance. I'd > > really like to get that code into something like openstack-common for > > several reasons: > > 1) keep quantum bloat down > > 2) make sure bug fixes/enhancements made in one project benefit all > projects > > 3) make sure teams don't have to duplicate work writing unit tests in > each > > project. > > > > Can someone working on openstack-common comment on the current state of > the > > work? Particularly, do we expect it to be a standard > > github.com/openstack/repo soon, and do we expect it to be packaged for > > major distros soon? It > > wouldn't seem like Quantum would want to start using it until that was > the > > case. > > > > Assuming we can start depending on openstack-common, I would advocate > for a > > review of the quantum codease identifying chunks that either are already > in > > openstack-common, or we think are good candidates for addition to > > openstack-common. > > > > Dan > > > > > > > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dan Wendlandt Nicira Networks: www.nicira.com twitter: danwendlandt ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
