Hi Brad, Good job here... I already +1
Edgar -----Original Message----- From: netstack-bounces+eperdomo=cisco....@lists.launchpad.net [mailto:netstack-bounces+eperdomo=cisco....@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of Brad Hall Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 11:11 PM To: netstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: [Netstack] Code coverage status Hey Everyone, After this change goes in (https://review.openstack.org/#change,677 [1]), you'll be able to generate code coverage numbers for our tests by using run_tests.sh -c. We're actually doing fairly good so far (sorry, gmail screws up the font): Name Stmts Miss Cover Missing ------------------------------------------------------------- quantum 0 0 100% quantum.api 28 0 100% quantum.api.api_common 47 0 100% quantum.api.attachments 48 6 88% 63-64, 74-77 quantum.api.faults 43 0 100% quantum.api.networks 65 1 98% 143 quantum.api.ports 83 4 95% 126-127, 134-135 quantum.api.views 0 0 100% quantum.api.views.attachments 10 0 100% quantum.api.views.networks 23 1 96% 58 quantum.api.views.ports 13 0 100% quantum.cli_lib 172 36 79% 86, 141-154, 184-185, 196-197, 210-211, 224-225, 237-238, 251-252, 264-266, 287-288, 302-303, 317-318, 330-331 quantum.client 146 14 90% 123-126, 132-135, 156, 164, 174, 188, 208-210, 232 quantum.common 0 0 100% quantum.common.config 112 75 33% 62-64, 74-90, 100-120, 131-179, 203-218, 248, 253-254, 283-284, 291-308 quantum.common.exceptions 74 19 74% 55-61, 71-73, 159-170 quantum.common.extensions 269 33 88% 69, 77, 85, 93, 102, 110-111, 119-120, 128-129, 137, 209, 212, 272-274, 338-343, 367-370, 379-382, 391-394, 439-443, 446-447, 459 quantum.common.flags 135 67 50% 52-91, 94-97, 101, 104, 107, 113-122, 127, 130-132, 135-142, 153, 156-160, 182, 201, 203, 237-240 quantum.common.utils 118 79 33% 51, 64-69, 79-81, 86-91, 95-103, 107-127, 131, 138-147, 152-153, 157-161, 168, 174-176, 180, 184-186, 190, 194-196, 203-205, 208-223, 226-227 quantum.common.wsgi 243 66 73% 44-45, 48, 53-54, 61, 65-66, 70-73, 77-78, 102, 106, 110-114, 136, 181, 217, 228-241, 249-254, 267, 373-374, 413-414, 439-440, 497, 501-506, 509-512, 519-526 quantum.db 0 0 100% quantum.db.api 136 11 92% 79-80, 94, 155-156, 196, 219, 226, 261, 266-267 quantum.db.models 51 13 75% 41, 44-45, 48-49, 53-54, 59-63, 84, 103 quantum.manager 36 5 86% 44, 56, 59, 61, 66 quantum.plugins 0 0 100% quantum.plugins.SamplePlugin 140 19 86% 43, 50, 57, 64, 71, 78, 84, 93, 99, 106, 113, 120, 125, 154, 166, 223, 299-300, 316 quantum.quantum_plugin_base 47 14 70% 54, 70, 85, 103, 120, 139, 153, 169, 187, 206, 220, 232, 258, 260 quantum.utils 57 33 42% 43-49, 54-59, 63-80, 86-88 ------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL 2096 496 76% ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 233 tests in 5.387s Thanks, Brad [1] Need another +1 for the review, btw. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
