Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 07:39:56PM CEST, j...@resnulli.us wrote: >Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 06:53:22PM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote: >>On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote: >>> Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 07:14:39PM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote: >>>>> Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 05:56:12AM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote: >>>>>>> From: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This patchset allows new rocker worlds to be easily added in future >>>>>>> (like eBPF >>>>>>> based one I have been working on). The main part of the patchset is the >>>>>>> OF-DPA >>>>>>> carve-out. It resuts in OF-DPA specific file. Clean cut. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> v1->v2: >>>>>>> - rtnl rocker mode change userspace expose patch was removed >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jiri Pirko (13): >>>>>>> rocker: remove unused rocker_port param from alloc funcs and shorten >>>>>>> their names >>>>>>> rocker: rename rocker.h to rocker_hw.h >>>>>>> rocker: rename rocker.c to rocker_main.c >>>>>>> rocker: push tlv processing into separate files >>>>>>> rocker: implement set settings mode command >>>>>>> rocker: introduce worlds infrastructure >>>>>>> rocker: introduce OF-DPA world skeleton >>>>>>> rocker: set default world on port probe and clean world on remove >>>>>>> rocker: pass "learning" value as a parameter to >>>>>>> rocker_port_set_learning >>>>>>> rocker: pre-allocate wait structures during cmd ring init >>>>>>> rocker: remove trans parameter to rocker_cmd_exec function >>>>>>> rocker: call rocker_cmd_exec function with "nowait" boolean instead of >>>>>>> flags >>>>>>> rocker: move OF-DPA stuff into separate file >>>>>> >>>>>>A couple of my tests are failing with this patchset. A simple port >>>>>>test is failing and IPv4 routing test is failing. >>>>>> >>>>>>The port test is simple: just connect a port on DUT to a port on >>>>>>another system and assign an IP address to each port and verify IP >>>>>>connectivity. I have this: >>>>>> >>>>>> DUT:sw1p1 (11.0.0.1/24) <-----------> host1:eth0 (11.0.0.2/24) >>>>>> >>>>>>The IPv4 routing tests is a bit more complicated to setup. I'm using >>>>>>OSPF, but I'm not seeing full routes formed in the topology, so I >>>>>>suspect OSPF hellos aren't getting thru. >>>>>> >>>>>>Please fix find/fix these issues and send v3. I don't want any git >>>>>>bisect issues when running tests. Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> I fixed that. Sending v3 in a sec. Thanks. >>>> >>>>Sorry, both tests are still broken. Would you send me your tests >>>>scripts so I can see why your tests are passing? >>> >>> I'm trying some smoke tests including bridge setup and just ip-ip >>> setup by hand. Meybe if you send me your scripts, I can run it locally. >> >>My test scripts are already included in the qemu tree. > >Okay, will rework and use your scripts. Hope I will find some time >during this weekend.
Scott, could you try to test with current net-next? I'm trying basic: DUT:sw1p1 (11.0.0.1/24) <-----------> host1:eth0 (11.0.0.2/24) and it does not work for me now. It worked previously when I tested with my patchset. This is getting odd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
