Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 06:53:22PM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote: >On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote: >> Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 07:14:39PM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote: >>>On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote: >>>> Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 05:56:12AM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote: >>>>>> From: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> >>>>>> >>>>>> This patchset allows new rocker worlds to be easily added in future >>>>>> (like eBPF >>>>>> based one I have been working on). The main part of the patchset is the >>>>>> OF-DPA >>>>>> carve-out. It resuts in OF-DPA specific file. Clean cut. >>>>>> >>>>>> v1->v2: >>>>>> - rtnl rocker mode change userspace expose patch was removed >>>>>> >>>>>> Jiri Pirko (13): >>>>>> rocker: remove unused rocker_port param from alloc funcs and shorten >>>>>> their names >>>>>> rocker: rename rocker.h to rocker_hw.h >>>>>> rocker: rename rocker.c to rocker_main.c >>>>>> rocker: push tlv processing into separate files >>>>>> rocker: implement set settings mode command >>>>>> rocker: introduce worlds infrastructure >>>>>> rocker: introduce OF-DPA world skeleton >>>>>> rocker: set default world on port probe and clean world on remove >>>>>> rocker: pass "learning" value as a parameter to >>>>>> rocker_port_set_learning >>>>>> rocker: pre-allocate wait structures during cmd ring init >>>>>> rocker: remove trans parameter to rocker_cmd_exec function >>>>>> rocker: call rocker_cmd_exec function with "nowait" boolean instead of >>>>>> flags >>>>>> rocker: move OF-DPA stuff into separate file >>>>> >>>>>A couple of my tests are failing with this patchset. A simple port >>>>>test is failing and IPv4 routing test is failing. >>>>> >>>>>The port test is simple: just connect a port on DUT to a port on >>>>>another system and assign an IP address to each port and verify IP >>>>>connectivity. I have this: >>>>> >>>>> DUT:sw1p1 (11.0.0.1/24) <-----------> host1:eth0 (11.0.0.2/24) >>>>> >>>>>The IPv4 routing tests is a bit more complicated to setup. I'm using >>>>>OSPF, but I'm not seeing full routes formed in the topology, so I >>>>>suspect OSPF hellos aren't getting thru. >>>>> >>>>>Please fix find/fix these issues and send v3. I don't want any git >>>>>bisect issues when running tests. Thanks. >>>> >>>> I fixed that. Sending v3 in a sec. Thanks. >>> >>>Sorry, both tests are still broken. Would you send me your tests >>>scripts so I can see why your tests are passing? >> >> I'm trying some smoke tests including bridge setup and just ip-ip >> setup by hand. Meybe if you send me your scripts, I can run it locally. > >My test scripts are already included in the qemu tree.
Okay, will rework and use your scripts. Hope I will find some time during this weekend. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
