* Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015, Hall, Christopher S wrote:
> > > Right, but we still do not know how that is going to be used. And
> > > that's the key question. As long as that is not answered all can do is
> > > wild guessing.
> >
> > It's not wild guessing. We do have it working on other OSs and have a
> > pretty
> > good idea of how it will work. The DSP firmware will be largely identical
> > for
> > Linux. I think now, we have a chicken and egg problem.
>
> You have a totally different problem. You are just refusing to explain how
> all
> that stuff is supposed to work and what kind of functionality you need
> exactly.
Yeah, so I'm just going to NAK this until things are improved:
NAKed-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
it's not like we are overly bored in timekeeping and need the extra complexity
as
much as possible.
Proper, comprehensive, proactive technical description is needed, with proper
changelogs, not just half-baked notes. If all that is fixed I'll lift my NAK.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
