On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 05:17:43PM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 05:10:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > I think what they're getting at is asking if there's a rate limit to > > time adjustments, without that, saving the last n transition points will > > still not cover any given length of history. > > As if the ntp code isn't complex enough already - now we're adding > sample histories and adjustment rating limiting? > > And all for some unknown DSP in a mythical sound card??
Hehe, I'm just a 'translator' here. But going by you answer I'm taking it there isn't in fact a rate-limit to adjustments. Which, even if you were not opposed to that direction, makes it an unfeasible proposition. Also, I'm not thinking its too mythical, sound/soc/intel/ is full of audio DSP stuff, I think a newer version will just gain ART support. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
