On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 8:39 PM, lucien xin <lucien....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think it would be much better to catch this in the validation stage.
>> If an implementation inserts multiple address parameters, we don't really
>> know
>> which one we should be using.
>>
>
> the params of ASCONF chunk should consist of one *Address Parameter* and one
> or more *ASCONF Parameters*. besides, the address parameter should be in the
> beginning. so the first one must be our choice.
>
> if we cat this in the validation stage, I think it will be hard to treat it
> as a
> unrecognized parameter,
because *unrecognized parameter* cause packet need to be built in
sctp_process_asconf(),
as current linux's implementation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
