> > I think it would be much better to catch this in the validation stage. > If an implementation inserts multiple address parameters, we don't really know > which one we should be using. >
the params of ASCONF chunk should consist of one *Address Parameter* and one or more *ASCONF Parameters*. besides, the address parameter should be in the beginning. so the first one must be our choice. if we cat this in the validation stage, I think it will be hard to treat it as a unrecognized parameter, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
