From: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 01:10:07 +0200

> Add two more eBPF test cases for JITs, i.e. the second one revealed a
> bug in the x86_64 JIT compiler, where only an int3 filled image from
> the allocator was emitted and later wrongly set by the compiler as the
> bpf_func program code since optimization pass boundary was surpassed
> w/o actually emitting opcodes.
> 
> Interpreter:
> 
>   [   45.782892] test_bpf: #242 BPF_MAXINSNS: Very long jump backwards 
> jited:0 11 PASS
>   [   45.783062] test_bpf: #243 BPF_MAXINSNS: Edge hopping nuthouse jited:0 
> 14705 PASS
> 
> After x86_64 JIT (fixed):
> 
>   [   80.495638] test_bpf: #242 BPF_MAXINSNS: Very long jump backwards 
> jited:1 6 PASS
>   [   80.495957] test_bpf: #243 BPF_MAXINSNS: Edge hopping nuthouse jited:1 
> 17157 PASS
> 
> Reference: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/364729
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net>

Applied, thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to