On 5/22/15 4:10 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
Add two more eBPF test cases for JITs, i.e. the second one revealed a
bug in the x86_64 JIT compiler, where only an int3 filled image from
the allocator was emitted and later wrongly set by the compiler as the
bpf_func program code since optimization pass boundary was surpassed
w/o actually emitting opcodes.

Interpreter:

   [   45.782892] test_bpf: #242 BPF_MAXINSNS: Very long jump backwards jited:0 
11 PASS
   [   45.783062] test_bpf: #243 BPF_MAXINSNS: Edge hopping nuthouse jited:0 
14705 PASS

After x86_64 JIT (fixed):

   [   80.495638] test_bpf: #242 BPF_MAXINSNS: Very long jump backwards jited:1 
6 PASS
   [   80.495957] test_bpf: #243 BPF_MAXINSNS: Edge hopping nuthouse jited:1 
17157 PASS

Reference: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/364729
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net>

Thanks a lot for great tests!

Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@plumgrid.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to