From: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 08:37:51 -0700
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:00:59 +0200 > Pavel Šimerda <pav...@pavlix.net> wrote: > >> From: Pavel Šimerda <psime...@redhat.com> >> >> Signed-off-by: Pavel Šimerda <psime...@redhat.com> >> --- >> ip/iproute.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > I understand your concern, and it probably was a poor design choice initially. > > Since this will change the output for the default case, it will upset some > peoples expectations and potentially break scripts that screen scrape the > output > of ip commands. Therefore I can't accept it at this time. > > Sorry for the delay, but I thought someone else would add more comments. > Perhaps if you explained in more detail the motivation of why this is an > important problem I would reconsider change the behavior. We definitely need to report routes created by caching/cloning separately from the main FIB entries. And I agree that even if we wanted to change behavior, the horse has already left the barn on this one and therefore there is no way we can change this now. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
