On 08/01/2008, Rick Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Potential bugs notwithstanding, given that this is a STREAM socket, and > as such shouldn't (I hope, or I'm eating toes for dinner again) have > side effects like tossing the rest of a datagram, why are you using > MSG_PEEK? Why not simply read the N bytes of the message that will have > the message length with a normal read/recv, and then read that many > bytes in the next call? > > rick jones > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
Hi, Where in the code is the message length being sent across the socket? -- Regards, Tom Spink University of Edinburgh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
