On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 05:10:00PM -0400, jamal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-16-09 at 16:52 -0400, jamal wrote:
>
> > What i should say is
> > if i grabbed the lock explicitly without disabling irqs it wont be much
> > different than what is done today and should always work.
> > No?
>
> And to be more explicit, heres a patch using the macros from previous
> patch. So far tested on 3 NICs.
How many cpu collisions you are seeing?
Did I understand you right, that you replaced trylock with lock and
thus removed collision handling and got better results?
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
