From: jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:33:52 -0400
> On Mon, 2007-17-09 at 22:48 -0400, jamal wrote: > > > Nothing much has changed from what it was before. > > The only difference is we let go of the queue lock before grabbing > > the tx lock which never mattered for LLTX. > > Once we grab the tx lock it is the same logic and so far is working well > > on both tg3 and e1000 (which is LLTX). > > I will continue to retest with net-2.6.24 once you complete rebasing > > and look around to see if anyone maybe affected. > > Ok, this is looking solid with this mornings tree. Tested on a dual core > xeon with e1000 (LLTX) and a dual core opteron with tg3 (non-LLTX). > About 100 million packets from udp full throttle on all 4 cpus; i tried > pulling cables etc while doing this to generate extrenous interupts and > didnt see any issues. > > Shall i submit the patch? Sure, along with a description as to why you want to make this change. I still don't understand the impetus. :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
