On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:13:07 -0700 Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This incorporates the new napi_struct changes into ixgbe. I get a reject storm. > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c > @@ -557,14 +557,15 @@ static irqreturn_t ixgbe_msix_clean_rx(int irq, void > *data) > struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter = rxr->adapter; > > IXGBE_WRITE_REG(&adapter->hw, IXGBE_EIMC, rxr->eims_value); > - netif_rx_schedule(adapter->netdev); > + netif_rx_schedule(adapter->netdev, &adapter->napi); > return IRQ_HANDLED; > } > For example, my copy of ixgbe_msix_clean_rx(), from git://lost.foo-projects.org/~aveerani/git/linux-2.6#ixgbe is: static irqreturn_t ixgbe_msix_clean_rx(int irq, void *data) { struct ixgbe_ring *rxr = data; struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter = rxr->adapter; #ifndef CONFIG_IXGBE_NAPI int i; for (i = 0; i < IXGBE_MAX_INTR; i++) if (unlikely(!ixgbe_clean_rx_irq(adapter, rxr))) break; #else IXGBE_WRITE_REG(&adapter->hw, IXGBE_EIMC, rxr->eims_value); netif_rx_schedule(adapter->netdev); #endif return IRQ_HANDLED; } which is quite different from the function whcih you're altering here? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html