On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:20:01 -0700 "Kok, Auke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:13:07 -0700 > > Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> This incorporates the new napi_struct changes into ixgbe. > > > > I get a reject storm. > > > >> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c > >> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c > >> @@ -557,14 +557,15 @@ static irqreturn_t ixgbe_msix_clean_rx(int irq, void > >> *data) > >> struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter = rxr->adapter; > >> > >> IXGBE_WRITE_REG(&adapter->hw, IXGBE_EIMC, rxr->eims_value); > >> - netif_rx_schedule(adapter->netdev); > >> + netif_rx_schedule(adapter->netdev, &adapter->napi); > >> return IRQ_HANDLED; > >> } > >> > > > > For example, my copy of ixgbe_msix_clean_rx(), from > > git://lost.foo-projects.org/~aveerani/git/linux-2.6#ixgbe is: > > please drop that tree, and get the one I posted last week instead: > > git://lost.foo-projects.org/~ahkok/linux-2.6 ixgbe-20070905-submission I think I just ignored that branch. It looks like some frozen-week-old snapshot, whereas I like to get the latest tip-of-tree. Or is that branch just misnamed? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
