YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:28:38 +0530), Varun > Chandramohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: > > >> According to the RFC 4292 (IP Forwarding Table MIB) there is a need for an >> age entry for all the routes in the routing table. The entry in the RFC is >> inetCidrRouteAge and oid is inetCidrRouteAge.1.10. >> Many snmp application require this age entry. So iam adding the age field in >> the routing table and providing >> the interface for this value via /proc/net/route. >> > > I'm not in favor of adding new field(s) to /proc/net/route. > > Do you think it will break any user level functionality? I have tested with netstat, route and net-snmp which reads from the same /proc interface. They seem to work fine. > --yoshfuji > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
