In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:28:38 +0530), Varun Chandramohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> According to the RFC 4292 (IP Forwarding Table MIB) there is a need for an > age entry for all the routes in the routing table. The entry in the RFC is > inetCidrRouteAge and oid is inetCidrRouteAge.1.10. > Many snmp application require this age entry. So iam adding the age field in > the routing table and providing > the interface for this value via /proc/net/route. I'm not in favor of adding new field(s) to /proc/net/route. --yoshfuji - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html