On 1/21/2021 9:09 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 3:40 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> <marcelo.leit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 02:18:41PM -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:33 AM <we...@ucloud.cn> wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/net/core/flow_dissector.c b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
>>>> index 2d70ded..c565c7a 100644
>>>> --- a/net/core/flow_dissector.c
>>>> +++ b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
>>>> @@ -237,9 +237,8 @@ void skb_flow_dissect_meta(const struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>> void
>>>> skb_flow_dissect_ct(const struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>> struct flow_dissector *flow_dissector,
>>>> - void *target_container,
>>>> - u16 *ctinfo_map,
>>>> - size_t mapsize)
>>>> + void *target_container, u16 *ctinfo_map,
>>>> + size_t mapsize, bool post_ct)
>>> Why do you pass this boolean as a parameter when you
>>> can just read it from qdisc_skb_cb(skb)?
>> In this case, yes, but this way skb_flow_dissect_ct() can/is able to
>> not care about what the ->cb actually is. It could be called from
>> somewhere else too.
> This sounds reasonable, it is in net/core/ directory anyway,
> so should be independent of tc even though cls_flower is its
> only caller.
yes. This is the same what I think.
>
> Thanks.
>
