On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 3:40 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 02:18:41PM -0800, Cong Wang wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:33 AM <we...@ucloud.cn> wrote: > > > diff --git a/net/core/flow_dissector.c b/net/core/flow_dissector.c > > > index 2d70ded..c565c7a 100644 > > > --- a/net/core/flow_dissector.c > > > +++ b/net/core/flow_dissector.c > > > @@ -237,9 +237,8 @@ void skb_flow_dissect_meta(const struct sk_buff *skb, > > > void > > > skb_flow_dissect_ct(const struct sk_buff *skb, > > > struct flow_dissector *flow_dissector, > > > - void *target_container, > > > - u16 *ctinfo_map, > > > - size_t mapsize) > > > + void *target_container, u16 *ctinfo_map, > > > + size_t mapsize, bool post_ct) > > > > Why do you pass this boolean as a parameter when you > > can just read it from qdisc_skb_cb(skb)? > > In this case, yes, but this way skb_flow_dissect_ct() can/is able to > not care about what the ->cb actually is. It could be called from > somewhere else too.
This sounds reasonable, it is in net/core/ directory anyway, so should be independent of tc even though cls_flower is its only caller. Thanks.
