On 2021-01-20 13:50, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
Björn Töpel <bjorn.to...@gmail.com> writes:

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index c001766adcbc..bbc7d9a57262 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -3836,6 +3836,12 @@ union bpf_attr {
   *    Return
   *            A pointer to a struct socket on success or NULL if the file is
   *            not a socket.
+ *
+ * long bpf_redirect_xsk(struct xdp_buff *xdp_md, u64 action)
+ *     Description
+ *             Redirect to the registered AF_XDP socket.
+ *     Return
+ *             **XDP_REDIRECT** on success, otherwise the action parameter is 
returned.
   */

I think it would be better to make the second argument a 'flags'
argument and make values > XDP_TX invalid (like we do in
bpf_xdp_redirect_map() now). By allowing any value as return you lose
the ability to turn it into a flags argument later...


Yes, but that adds a run-time check. I prefer this non-checked version,
even though it is a bit less futureproof.


Björn

Reply via email to