Hi Rasmus, On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 03:39:34AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > I finally managed to figure out why enabling VLAN filtering on the > 6250 broke all (ingressing) traffic, > cf. > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/6424c14e-bd25-2a06-cf0b-f1a07f9a3...@prevas.dk/ > . > > The first patch is the minimal fix and for net, while the second one > is a little cleanup for net-next. > > Rasmus Villemoes (2): > net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: also read STU state in mv88e6250_g1_vtu_getnext > net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: use mv88e6185_g1_vtu_getnext() for the 6250
It's strange to put a patch for net and one for net-next in the same series. Nobody will keep a note for you to apply the second patch after net has been merged back into net-next. So if you want to keep the two-patch approach, you'd have to send just the "net" patch now, and the "net-next" patch later. But is there any reason why you don't just apply the second patch to "net"?
