On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 03:39, Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villem...@prevas.dk> wrote: > mv88e6250_g1_vtu_getnext is almost identical to > mv88e6185_g1_vtu_getnext, except for the 6250 only having 64 databases > instead of 256. We can reduce code duplication by simply masking off > the extra two garbage bits when assembling the fid from VTU op [3:0] > and [11:8]. > > Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villem...@prevas.dk>
We might also want to give mv88e6250_g1_vtu_loadpurge the same treatment. Reviewed-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tob...@waldekranz.com> Tested-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tob...@waldekranz.com>
