Hi Prabhakar,
On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 5:00 PM Lad Prabhakar
<prabhakar.mahadev-lad...@bp.renesas.com> wrote:
> The rcar_canfd driver supports R-Car Gen3 and RZ/G2 SoC's, update the
> description to reflect this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad...@bp.renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+rene...@glider.be>
> --- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/Kconfig
> @@ -10,13 +10,13 @@ config CAN_RCAR
> be called rcar_can.
>
> config CAN_RCAR_CANFD
> - tristate "Renesas R-Car CAN FD controller"
> + tristate "Renesas R-Car Gen3 and RZ/G2 CAN FD controller"
> depends on ARCH_RENESAS || ARM
Not introduced by this patch, but the "|| ARM" looks strange to me.
Is this meant for compile-testing? Doesn't the driver compile on all
platforms (it does on m68k), so "|| COMPILE_TEST" is not appropriate?
Is the CAN FD controller present on some Renesas arm32 SoCs (but
not yet supported by this driver)?
> help
> Say Y here if you want to use CAN FD controller found on
> - Renesas R-Car SoCs. The driver puts the controller in CAN FD only
> - mode, which can interoperate with CAN2.0 nodes but does not support
> - dedicated CAN 2.0 mode.
> + Renesas R-Car Gen3 and RZ/G2 SoCs. The driver puts the
> + controller in CAN FD only mode, which can interoperate with
> + CAN2.0 nodes but does not support dedicated CAN 2.0 mode.
>
> To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will
> be called rcar_canfd.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
