On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 12:20:19 +0800 weichenchen wrote:
> pneigh_enqueue() tries to obtain a random delay by mod
> NEIGH_VAR(p, PROXY_DELAY). However, NEIGH_VAR(p, PROXY_DELAY)
> migth be zero at that point because someone could write zero
> to /proc/sys/net/ipv4/neigh/[device]/proxy_delay after the
> callers check it.
> 
> This patch double-checks NEIGH_VAR(p, PROXY_DELAY) in
> pneigh_enqueue() to ensure not to take zero as modulus.
> 
> Signed-off-by: weichenchen <weichen.c...@linux.alibaba.com>

Let's have the caller pass in the value since it did the checking?

> diff --git a/net/core/neighbour.c b/net/core/neighbour.c
> index 9500d28a43b0..eb5d015c53d3 100644
> --- a/net/core/neighbour.c
> +++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
> @@ -1570,9 +1570,14 @@ void pneigh_enqueue(struct neigh_table *tbl, struct 
> neigh_parms *p,
>                   struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
>       unsigned long now = jiffies;
> +     unsigned long sched_next;
>  
> -     unsigned long sched_next = now + (prandom_u32() %
> -                                       NEIGH_VAR(p, PROXY_DELAY));
> +     int delay = NEIGH_VAR(p, PROXY_DELAY);
> +
> +     if (delay <= 0)

Not that this still doesn't guarantee that the compiler won't re-read
the value (however unlikely). We need a READ_ONCE().

> +             sched_next = now;
> +     else
> +             sched_next = now + (prandom_u32() % delay);
>  
>       if (tbl->proxy_queue.qlen > NEIGH_VAR(p, PROXY_QLEN)) {
>               kfree_skb(skb);

Reply via email to