On 12/3/20 6:01 AM, Stephen Suryaputra wrote: > The tests in fcnal-test.sh passed. There are two failures that are > expected, I think. Attached is the output.
I'll take a look at the failures. > > If you agree that my patch is the right solution, I can send the patch > out for review. I think so, just trying to understand why that change was not needed until now. Go ahead a send as a proper patch. Please add the commands for this use case to fcnal-test.sh. There is a catch-all 'use_cases' section. You can add it as a another one. Do the ping in both directions after initial configuration and again after cycling the netdev -- shows success after the route table re-ordering.