On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 16:18:08 +0100 Karsten Graul wrote:
> @@ -295,6 +377,14 @@ static int smc_diag_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
> netlink_callback *cb)
>
> static int smc_diag_dump_ext(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback
> *cb)
> {
> + struct smc_diag_req_v2 *req = nlmsg_data(cb->nlh);
> +
> + if (req->cmd == SMC_DIAG_GET_LGR_INFO) {
> + if ((req->cmd_ext & (1 << (SMC_DIAG_LGR_INFO_SMCR - 1))))
> + smc_diag_fill_lgr_list(smc_diag_ops->get_lgr_list(),
> + skb, cb, req);
> + }
> +
> return skb->len;
> }
IDK if this is appropriate for socket diag handler.
Is there precedent for funneling commands through socket diag instead
of just creating a genetlink family?
