On Sat, 07 Nov 2020, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 02 Nov 2020, Brian Norris wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 3:25 AM Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> wrote:
> >> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.h
> >> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.h
> >> > @@ -212,6 +212,10 @@ struct rtw_pci {
> >> > void __iomem *mmap;
> >> > };
> >> >
> >> > +int rtw_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id);
> >> > +void rtw_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> >> > +void rtw_pci_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> >> > +
> >> >
> >>
> >> These definitions are already in 4 other header files:
> >>
> >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723de.h
> >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8821ce.h
> >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822be.h
> >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822ce.h
> >>
> >> Seems like you should be moving them, not just adding yet another
> >> duplicate.
> >
> > I followed the current convention.
> >
> > Happy to optimise if that's what is required.
>
> I agree with Brian, these and rtw_pm_ops should be moved to pci.h to
> avoid code duplication.
Will do, thanks.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
