Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> writes:
> On Mon, 02 Nov 2020, Brian Norris wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 3:25 AM Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.h
>> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.h
>> > @@ -212,6 +212,10 @@ struct rtw_pci {
>> > void __iomem *mmap;
>> > };
>> >
>> > +int rtw_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id);
>> > +void rtw_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>> > +void rtw_pci_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>> > +
>> >
>>
>> These definitions are already in 4 other header files:
>>
>> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723de.h
>> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8821ce.h
>> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822be.h
>> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822ce.h
>>
>> Seems like you should be moving them, not just adding yet another duplicate.
>
> I followed the current convention.
>
> Happy to optimise if that's what is required.
I agree with Brian, these and rtw_pm_ops should be moved to pci.h to
avoid code duplication.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
