On Tue,  3 Nov 2020 18:50:38 +1000 Pavana Sharma wrote:
> The Marvell 88E6393X device is a single-chip integration of a 11-port
> Ethernet switch with eight integrated Gigabit Ethernet (GbE) transceivers
> and three 10-Gigabit interfaces.
> 
> This patch adds functionalities specific to mv88e6393x family (88E6393X,
> 88E6193X and 88E6191X)

Please fix all checkpatch --strict --min-conf-desc-length=80 warnings
and what I point out below

> Co-developed-by: Ashkan Boldaji <ashkan.bold...@digi.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ashkan Boldaji <ashkan.bold...@digi.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pavana Sharma <pavana.sha...@digi.com>

> +     reg &= ~(MV88E6XXX_PORT_MAC_CTL_SPEED_MASK |
> +                     MV88E6390_PORT_MAC_CTL_ALTSPEED |
> +                     MV88E6390_PORT_MAC_CTL_FORCE_SPEED);

Align the continuation lines under the opening bracket, like the kernel
coding style require, please.

> +
> +     if (speed != SPEED_UNFORCED)
> +             reg |= MV88E6390_PORT_MAC_CTL_FORCE_SPEED;
> +
> +     reg |= ctrl;
> +
> +     err = mv88e6xxx_port_write(chip, port, MV88E6XXX_PORT_MAC_CTL, reg);
> +     if (err)
> +             return err;
> +
> +     return 0;

no need to set err, just directly do:

        return mv88e6xxx_port_write(chip, port, MV88E6XXX_PORT_MAC_CTL,
        reg);

> +}
> +
>  static int mv88e6xxx_port_set_cmode(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port,
>                                   phy_interface_t mode, bool force)
>  {

> +/* Offset 0x0E: Policy & MGMT Control Register for FAMILY 6191X 6193X 6393X*/

Missing space at the end of that comment.

> +static int mv88e6393x_port_policy_write(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, u16 
> pointer,
> +                             u8 data)
> +{
> +
> +     int err = 0;
> +     int port;
> +     u16 reg;
> +
> +     /* Setup per Port policy register */
> +     for (port = 0; port < mv88e6xxx_num_ports(chip); port++) {
> +             if (dsa_is_unused_port(chip->ds, port))
> +                     continue;
> +
> +             /* Prevent the use of an invalid port. */
> +             if (mv88e6xxx_is_invalid_port(chip, port)) {
> +                     dev_err(chip->dev, "port %d is invalid\n", port);
> +                     err = -EINVAL;

did you mean to exit here? this assignment looks pointless

> +             }
> +             reg = MV88E6393X_PORT_POLICY_MGMT_CTL_UPDATE | pointer | data;
> +             err = mv88e6xxx_port_write(chip, port, 
> MV88E6393X_PORT_POLICY_MGMT_CTL, reg);
> +     }
> +     return err;
> +}

> +int mv88e6393x_port_mgmt_rsvd2cpu(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
> +{
> +     u16 ptr;
> +     int err;
> +
> +     /* Consider the frames with reserved multicast destination
> +      * addresses matching 01:80:c2:00:00:00 and
> +      * 01:80:c2:00:00:02 as MGMT.
> +      */
> +     ptr = MV88E6393X_PORT_POLICY_MGMT_CTL_PTR_01C280000000XLO;
> +     err = mv88e6393x_port_policy_write(chip, ptr, 0xff);
> +     if (err)
> +             return err;
> +
> +     ptr = MV88E6393X_PORT_POLICY_MGMT_CTL_PTR_01C280000000XHI;
> +     err = mv88e6393x_port_policy_write(chip, ptr, 0xff);
> +     if (err)
> +             return err;
> +
> +     ptr = MV88E6393X_PORT_POLICY_MGMT_CTL_PTR_01C280000002XLO;
> +     err = mv88e6393x_port_policy_write(chip, ptr, 0xff);
> +     if (err)
> +             return err;
> +
> +     ptr = MV88E6393X_PORT_POLICY_MGMT_CTL_PTR_01C280000002XHI;
> +     err = mv88e6393x_port_policy_write(chip, ptr, 0xff);
> +     if (err)
> +             return err;
> +
> +     return 0;

return mv...

> +}
> +


> +     err = mv88e6xxx_port_write(chip, port, MV88E6393X_PORT_EPC_CMD, val);
> +     if (err)
> +             return err;
> +
> +     return 0;

ditto

> +}

> +
> +int mv88e6393x_serdes_power(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port, int lane,
> +                 bool on)
> +{
> +     if (port == 0 || port == 9 || port == 10) {

Flip the condition, return early. Entire body of a function should not
have to be indented.

> +             u8 cmode = chip->ports[port].cmode;
> +
> +             mv88e6393x_serdes_port_config(chip, lane, on);
> +
> +             switch (cmode) {
> +             case MV88E6XXX_PORT_STS_CMODE_1000BASEX:
> +             case MV88E6XXX_PORT_STS_CMODE_2500BASEX:
> +                     return mv88e6390_serdes_power_sgmii(chip, lane, on);
> +             case MV88E6XXX_PORT_STS_CMODE_10GBASER:
> +                     return mv88e6390_serdes_power_10g(chip, lane, on);
> +             }
> +     }
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}

> @@ -130,7 +169,7 @@ int mv88e6390_serdes_get_regs_len(struct mv88e6xxx_chip 
> *chip, int port);
>  void mv88e6390_serdes_get_regs(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port, void 
> *_p);
>  
>  /* Return the (first) SERDES lane address a port is using, ERROR otherwise. 
> */
> -static inline u8 mv88e6xxx_serdes_get_lane(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
> +static inline int mv88e6xxx_serdes_get_lane(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
>                                          int port)

Looks like this should be in patch 3?

>  {
>       if (!chip->info->ops->serdes_get_lane)

Reply via email to