On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 2:20 PM Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.ker...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for that context. If it's not captured in the code, it would be > great to include in the commit message.
OK. I'll update the commit message. > From a quick scan, RFC 2427 does not appear to actually define the > Q.922 address. For that I ended up reading ITU-T doc "Q.922 : ISDN > data link layer specification for frame mode bearer services", section > 3.2. Yeah. Thanks for posting the name of the document. It's good to see ITU's documents are published in multiple languages because this feels more international :)
