On 10/14/20 4:31 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
> For some devices, updating the flash can take significant time during
> operations where no status can meaningfully be reported. This can be
> somewhat confusing to a user who sees devlink appear to hang on the
> terminal waiting for the device to update.
> 
> Recent changes to the kernel interface allow such long running commands
> to provide a timeout value indicating some upper bound on how long the
> relevant action could take.
> 
> Provide a ticking counter of the time elapsed since the previous status
> message in order to make it clear that the program is not simply stuck.
> 
> Display this message whenever the status message from the kernel
> indicates a timeout value. Additionally also display the message if
> we've received no status for more than couple of seconds. If we elapse
> more than the timeout provided by the status message, replace the
> timeout display with "timeout reached".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com>
> ---
> Changes since v2
> * use clock_gettime on CLOCK_MONOTONIC instead of gettimeofday
> * remove use of timersub since we're now using struct timespec
> 
>  devlink/devlink.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 104 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 

applied to iproute2-next.

The DEVLINK attributes are ridiculously long --
DEVLINK_ATTR_FLASH_UPDATE_STATUS_TIMEOUT is 40 characters -- which
forces really long code lines or oddly wrapped lines. Going forward
please consider abbreviations on name components to reduce their lengths.

Reply via email to